Power Electronics



Eliminate the Guesswork in Selecting Crossover Frequency

Aug 1, 2008 12:00 PM
By Christophe Basso, Application Manager, ON Semiconductor, Toulouse, France


Rather than arbitrarily choosing a converter’s crossover based on the switching frequency, you can analytically determine the relationship between its crossover and its undershoot in response to a load step.


In most power-supply design examples it is common to arbitrarily place the crossover frequency at one-fifth or one-tenth the switching frequency. However, the crossover frequency actually affects the converter's output impedance and there is a true relationship between these two parameters. Therefore, once a designer selects the output capacitor based on its operating parameters such as rms current, temperature or acceptable voltage ripple, the designer can analytically select the crossover frequency to match the desired output undershoot.

This discussion shows how to derive the relationship that links crossover frequency and undershoot and describes how to tailor the bandwidth to fit exactly the converter's design requirements.

Simplified Buck Converter

Fig. 1 shows a simplified buck converter represented by a square-wave generator driving a low-pass filter. Both the inductor and the capacitor have ohmic losses. The output impedance of such a network can be derived with the input source shorted:

where ZOUT equals the output impedance in ohms, LOUT equals the output inductance in henrys, COUT equals the output capacitance in farads, rLf equals the inductor resistance in ohms and rCf equals the COUT equivalent series resistance (ESR) in ohms.

Through inspection, the designer can see that the inductor's resistance dominates the output impedance at dc (LOUT is shorted and COUT is open) and that its inductance dominates as the frequency increases. Then the capacitor impedance starts to take over until it becomes a short circuit and leaves the impedance value to its series loss rCf.

By connecting a 1-A ac source to the output, the designer has the ability to quickly plot the output impedance versus frequency using a SPICE simulator. Fig. 2 portrays the obtained results. As can be seen, a peaking occurs at the resonant frequency (f0). The maximum of this peaking can be analytically derived[1]:

where ZOUTMAX equals the maximum output impedance in ohms and Z0 = equals the characteristic impedance of the filter in ohms.

Such peaking is typical of a buck output impedance behavior where the LC filter has been optimized to minimize the losses. This situation induces a high-quality coefficient, hence a severe peaking in the impedance graph. One of the feedback aims is to minimize the output impedance to reduce as much as possible the voltage drop due to a load step. On an amplitude versus frequency plot, the natural output impedance of the filter dramatically peaks at the resonant frequency. Therefore, if a crossover frequency below the LC filter resonance is selected, there will not be enough of a gain to get rid of the resonance and, despite a good phase margin, the system will oscillate. If the designer wants to obtain a good transient response, he or she has to make sure the loop gain remains high enough to tame the peaking when it occurs. In other words, the crossover frequency (fC) must be selected at least three to five times above f0.

In Fig. 2, if a crossover region is selected beyond the resonance, the designer can see an impedance graph dominated by the output capacitor impedance (COUT). At the crossover frequency, this impedance is:

where fC equals the crossover frequency and ZOUTOL equals the open-loop output impedance.

Above the crossover frequency, the capacitor's ohmic losses dominate the network's output impedance. To ensure Eq. 3 rules the output impedance alone at the crossover point, the capacitor ESR must be much smaller than the output impedance at the crossover frequency. Mathematically, the following condition must be met:

In choosing the final capacitor, besides ripple current and temperature considerations, the designer must also consider the capacitor ESR at the selected crossover frequency.


Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus


April 1, 2009
power electronics technology magazine current issue cover
Advertisement




Power Systems News

Broad Range of EMI Filters

Industry's Smallest Integrated Power Stage (iPSTM)

New Jersey Utility to Build 120MW of Solar Capacity

XP Vehicles Expects U. S. DOE ATVM Funding to Complete Development of Revolutionary Electric Vehicle

Triple Output 500W Medical Grade Power Supplies

 
Back to Top

Topic Index

Discrete Semis
Bipolar Transistors
IGBTs
Power Modules
Power MOSFETs
Rectifiers/Diodes
Thyristors

Power Management
Digital Power Control
High-Voltage Devices
LED Drivers
Lighting Power Management
Motor Power Management
Power ICs
PWM Controllers
Regulator ICs

Portable Power Management
Batteries
Battery Charger ICs
Fuel Gauges Controllers and Regulators
Micro Fuel Cells

Passives/Packaging
Capacitors
Circuit Protection Devices
Connectors
Magnetics
Packaging
Printed Circuit Boards
Resistors
Sensors & Transducers
Switches & Electromagnetic Relays

Topic Pages
Wind Power
Flyback Transformers

Thermal Management
Fans
Heatpipes & Spreaders
Heatsinks
Liquid Cooling
Thermal Interface Materials
Thermal Management Simulation

Power Systems
DC-DC Converters
Distributed Power Architectures
EMI & EMC
Linear Power Supplies
Safety/Environmental Approvals
Simulation/Modeling
Switch-Mode Power Supplies
Test & Measurement Uninterruptible Power Supplies

Digital Power
Commentaries
Digital Power News
Digital Power Products
Design Features


Contact Us  E-mail Webmaster  For Advertisers  For Search Partners  Privacy Statement  Subscribe  Terms of Use
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc. All rights reserved.