Eliminate the Guesswork in Selecting Crossover Frequency
Aug 1, 2008 12:00 PM
By Christophe Basso, Application Manager, ON Semiconductor, Toulouse, France
Rather than arbitrarily choosing a converter’s crossover based on the switching frequency, you can analytically determine the relationship between its crossover and its undershoot in response to a load step.
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
In most power-supply design examples it is common to arbitrarily place the crossover frequency at one-fifth or one-tenth the switching frequency. However, the crossover frequency actually affects the converter's output impedance and there is a true relationship between these two parameters. Therefore, once a designer selects the output capacitor based on its operating parameters such as rms current, temperature or acceptable voltage ripple, the designer can analytically select the crossover frequency to match the desired output undershoot.
This discussion shows how to derive the relationship that links crossover frequency and undershoot and describes how to tailor the bandwidth to fit exactly the converter's design requirements.
Simplified Buck Converter
Fig. 1 shows a simplified buck converter represented by a square-wave generator driving a low-pass filter. Both the inductor and the capacitor have ohmic losses. The output impedance of such a network can be derived with the input source shorted:
|
where Z
Through inspection, the designer can see that the inductor's resistance dominates the output impedance at dc (L
By connecting a 1-A ac source to the output, the designer has the ability to quickly plot the output impedance versus frequency using a SPICE simulator. Fig. 2 portrays the obtained results. As can be seen, a peaking occurs at the resonant frequency (f
|
where Z
Such peaking is typical of a buck output impedance behavior where the LC filter has been optimized to minimize the losses. This situation induces a high-quality coefficient, hence a severe peaking in the impedance graph. One of the feedback aims is to minimize the output impedance to reduce as much as possible the voltage drop due to a load step. On an amplitude versus frequency plot, the natural output impedance of the filter dramatically peaks at the resonant frequency. Therefore, if a crossover frequency below the LC filter resonance is selected, there will not be enough of a gain to get rid of the resonance and, despite a good phase margin, the system will oscillate. If the designer wants to obtain a good transient response, he or she has to make sure the loop gain remains high enough to tame the peaking when it occurs. In other words, the crossover frequency (f
In Fig. 2, if a crossover region is selected beyond the resonance, the designer can see an impedance graph dominated by the output capacitor impedance (C
|
where f
Above the crossover frequency, the capacitor's ohmic losses dominate the network's output impedance. To ensure Eq. 3 rules the output impedance alone at the crossover point, the capacitor ESR must be much smaller than the output impedance at the crossover frequency. Mathematically, the following condition must be met:
|
In choosing the final capacitor, besides ripple current and temperature considerations, the designer must also consider the capacitor ESR at the selected crossover frequency.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus

