1700V IGBT Module Employs Non-Epitaxial PT chips, Low Inductance Package
Mar 1, 2001 12:00 PM
H. Iwamoto, Mitsubishi Electric Corp. Japan, Kouichi Mochizuki, Fukuryo Semiconductor Engineering Co
IGBT module is compatible with 600V and 1200V types.
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
While punch throughs (PTs) are the preferred power device for a growing segment of industrial power conversion applications requiring operation from ac line voltages of 575Vac to 690Vac, historically, 1700V IGBTs based on a non punch through (NPT) structure were popular. For the NPT device to have stable leakage current at such high blocking voltages, a thick n
An alternate approach is to use an epitaxial buffer layer chip (PT structure) that yields lower losses. However, the very thick epitaxy required for high blocking voltages substantially increases fabrication costs. To circumvent these problems, the development of a new 1700V IGBT chip is possible by adopting a single crystal (non-epitaxial) wafer with a diffused buffer layer (PT structure) and local lifetime control (Fig. 1a).
Chip Comparison
You can roughly categorize IGBTs according to their main voltage blocking structure. The punch through (PT) IGBT uses a lightly doped high resistivity n
Recently, manufacturers successfully produced IGBTs based on both structures for power conversion applications. By taking advantage of the key technologies developed during the continuous evolution and optimization of these competing structures, manufacturers have produced a new 1700V device exhibiting the best characteristics of both structures. To understand this new device we must first review the conventional PT and NPT structures.
PT IGBT
The first commercial IGBTs used a punch through (PT) chip structure. This structure is still the most common today. Manufacturers normally produce the PT IGBT using a starting material of positively-doped silicon (collector layer), on which the other layers are grown epitaxially (Fig. 1b). The well-controlled resistivity and thickness of the epitaxial n
To achieve low switching losses in a PT IGBT, you must accelerate the rate of recombination of charge (carrier lifetime) in the buffer layer. Historically, electron irradiation served this purpose. Electron irradiation creates recombination sites in the buffer layer, which yields increased turnoff speed and lower tail current losses. However, this process introduces recombination sites in the n
A new lifetime control technique using proton beam irradiation
The cost of the epitaxial silicon is a drawback of this type of PT structure. This is a significant factor in the case of rugged high voltage (V
NPT IGBT
Non punch through (NPT) IGBTs are developed using a homogeneous silicon starting material into which the collector and other layers are diffused (Fig. 1c, on page 28). In this structure, the thickness and resistivity of the n
The lack of a buffer layer in the NPT IGBT makes lifetime control processing unnecessary. As a result, the temperature dependence of switching losses is less than PT IGBTs fabricated using conventional electron irradiation for lifetime control processing. The lack of lifetime control produces a long low-level tail current. Switching loss measurements truncated at 5% to 10% of rated current often ignore the switching losses associated with these tail currents.
The homogenous float zone silicon material used in the NPT IGBT is lower cost than the epitaxial silicon utilized in most PT devices. This becomes a significant factor in high voltage devices that require thick n
Another common side effect of the NPT chip design is a positive dependence of V
1700V IGBT
An analysis of the characteristics and performance of PT and NPT IGBT processes and structures have lead to the following design targets for the new 1700V IGBT chip.
- The n
- drift region should be as thin as possible to give a low VCE(sat) . However, you should do this without compromising short circuit robustness or switching SOA. - An n
- buffer layer is necessary to secure a sufficiently high breakdown voltage and low leakage current in the presence of an optimally thin n- drift region. - You should optimize lifetime control and buffer layer doping to produce a lower cross-point of the V
CE(sat) vs. current characteristic, thereby achieving a positive temperature coefficient of VCE(sat) . - Base silicon material should be low cost single crystal (non-epitaxial) material.
Fig. 1a, on page 28, shows the structure of the new IGBT compared with the conventional PT (Fig. 1b) and NPT (Fig. 1c) structures. Manufacturers produce the new 1700V IGBT chip, designated “K-Series,” from an n
K-Series IGBT Characteristics
You can see the saturation voltage characteristic of a 150A, 1700V IGBT module in Fig. 2. This plot shows the new IGBT has a positive temperature coefficient of V
The turnoff waveform shows the short duration tail current typical of a PT IGBT with lifetime control processing. Optimization of the lifetime control also allowed the reduction of the turnoff di/dt to prevent the severe transient voltages typical of many NPT designs.
The turn-on waveform shows the recovery characteristic of the newly developed soft recovery free wheel diode utilized in the K-Series modules. The adoption of an optimized proton beam irradiation profile ensures soft recovery over a wide range of currents and temperatures. Compared with conventional fast recovery diodes, this provides a significant reduction in recovery oscillations and the resulting EMI noise.
The SOA test result in Fig. 5 demonstrates device robustness. This shows a 150A device switching at more than three times rated current, which is a sufficient margin for the normal guaranteed SOA rating of two times nominal current.
The 1700V IGBT was designed to survive a low impedance short circuit with an 1100Vdc bus. Fig. 6 shows the current and voltage waveforms for a low impedance short circuit test. This waveform shows you can safely turn it off after a 10 μsec short circuit.
Module Package
To obtain maximum performance from the 1700V IGBT chips, an optimized module package and a free wheel diode with improved fast, but soft recovery characteristics were developed. The “U-Package” technology, developed by Mitsubishi in 1996
Fig. 7 shows a cross section drawing of the new package. The key innovation is the insert-molded case in which the power electrodes are molded into the sides as opposed to inserted after the case is molded. The main electrodes then connect directly to the power chips using large diameter aluminum bonding wires rather than solder.
One of the main objectives in the design of the new package was a reduction in internal inductance. The most significant improvement was possible by molding wide electrodes into the sides of the case to form parallel plate structures having considerably less inductance than conventional electrodes. In addition, the strain relieving “S” bends that were needed in the electrodes of conventional modules are not needed in the U-Package because the aluminum bond wires perform the strain relieving function. Elimination of these “S” bends helped to further reduce the electrode inductance.
As an overall result of these inductance-reducing features, the new package has about one-third the inductance of conventional modules. The resistance of the electrodes has a more significant reduction compared with conventional modules, which reduces self-heating and improves reliability in high current applications.
Reducing the required number of soldering steps in the new module package (from two to one) allows for high speed automated assembly and testing. With the conventional module, you made the chip to substrate and substrate to baseplate soldering first with high temperature solder. Then, you attach the case to the baseplate and you use a second low temperature-soldering step to connect the power electrodes. In the new module, you can eliminate the second step because aluminum bond wires create the connections to the power electrodes.
The soldering process for chip and substrate attachment minimizes the effects of mismatched coefficients of expansion between the baseplate and the AlN (aluminum nitride) DBC (direct bond copper) substrate. The results are a reduction in stress during manufacturing, improved baseplate flatness, and increased reliability. Fig. 8, on page 38, illustrates the improvement in power cycling capability.
Another advantage of the new package is the substantially smaller ceramic substrate. The ceramic area needed for soldering the power electrodes in the conventional module is not a requirement. As a result, you can use higher performance AlN ceramic in a cost effective manner, to minimize the thermal impedance of the new package. The smaller ceramic geometries also reduce leakage capacitance to the baseplate, which is a major source of conducted EMI. The typical leakage capacitance of the U-Package is about one-third that of modules utilizing thin Al
References
Hideo Iwamoto et. al., “A Punch Through IGBT Having A New N-Buffer Layer,” IEEE IAS Oct. 1999.
E. Motto et. al., “Characteristics of a 1200V PT IGBT With Trench Gate and Local Life Time Control,” IEEE IAS Oct. 1998.
G. Majumdar, et al. “A New Generation High Speed Low Loss IGBT Module,” ISPSD, May 1992.
Majumdar, et. al., “Enhancing SOAs of IGBT Modules for Hard Switching Applications,” PCIM 1990.
M. Harada, et. al., “600V Trench IGBT in Comparison with Planar IGBT,” ISPSD May 31, 1994.
T. Iida, et. al., “Low VCE(sat) IGBT Module by New Structure — Trench,” PCIM Europe June 28, 1994.
E. Motto, et. al., “Evaluating the Dynamic Performance of High Current IGBT Modules,” PCIM/PQ 1994.
Eric R. Motto, “New Process Technologies Improve IGBT Module Efficiency,” IEEE IAS Conference Oct. 1995.
Eric R. Motto, “A New Low Inductance IGBT Module Package,” PCIM Conference Sept. 1996.
D. S. Kuo, et. al., “Modeling the Turn-off Characteristics of Bipolar MOS Transistor,” IEEE Electron Device Letter EDL-6, pp 211-214, 1985.
Yamashita, Yamada, Uchida, and Yamaguchi, “A Relation between Dynamic Saturation Characteristics and Tail Current of Non-Punch through IGBT,” IAS 1998.
Mochizuki, Ishii, Takeda. Hagino, and Yamada, “Examination of Punch Through IGBT for High Voltage and High Current Applications”, ISPSD 1997.
W. Wondrak and D. Silber, “Buried Recombination Layers with Enhanced N-Type Conductivity for Silicon Power Devices”, Phisica BC, Vol. 129, pp 322-326, 1985.
For more information on this article, CIRCLE 332 on Reader Service Card

