SEPIC Converters Solve Automotive Power NeedsPart 1
Mar 1, 2009 12:00 PM
Kalje, N., Maxim, Rao, S. P., Maxim
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
Single-ended primary inductance converter (SEPIC) topology is a good choice for automotive power systems that require an output voltage between the low and high values of the input voltage. SEPIC topology fits this application because its duty ratio can be varied around 50% to provide an output voltage that is either below or above the input voltage. Additionally, compared to flyback converters, SEPIC converters avoid the problems with leakage inductance and snubbers.
Fig. 1 shows the basic SEPIC topology. In the steady-state during the switch (SW) on-time, energy is stored in inductor L1. The inductor currents IL1 and IL2 ramp up at a slope determined by the input voltage and the inductances L1 and L2. The L2 inductor current ramps up at the same rate through coupling capacitor CS and SW. The CS positive terminal is at ground potential, and the voltage across L2 is V
Current-mode PWM controllers, such as the MAX15004/15005, operate over an automotive input voltage range from 4.5 V to 40 V (load-dump). The input voltage can go down as low as 2.5 V (cold-crank) after startup if V
To optimize SEPIC converter performance, let's examine the design procedures to select the component values for the controller and evaluate the performance with some measurements in a practical design. The typical specifications are used to demonstrate the actual design. The system specs are V
POWER SECTION DESIGN
Voltage-mode control was passed over in favor of current-mode control, because current-mode control responds immediately to line voltage changes and provides inherent overcurrent protection for the switching device. Due to its simpler dynamics and inherent protection features, a peak current-mode control architecture is used in the MAX15005A. Peak current-mode control compares the amplified output-voltage error with the primary inductor current signal. Using the MAX15005A pulse-width modulator (PWM), the primary inductor current ramp is compared against the amplified output-voltage error.
The inner current control loop contains a small current-sense resistor that senses the primary switch current. The resistor transforms this current waveform into a voltage signal that is fed directly into the inverting input of the PWM comparator. The slope-compensated voltage is summed inside the chip and then fed to the PWM comparator to avoid subharmonic oscillations when duty ratios are greater than 50%. This inner loop determines the response to input voltage changes. The outer voltage control loop involves comparing a portion of the output voltage to a reference voltage at the input of the internal error amplifier. The amplified error voltage is then connected to the noninverting input of the PWM comparator. The PWM comparator output drives a MOSFET driver after overcurrent, overvoltage and thermal-protection logic.
Peak current-mode control requires simpler compensation, has pulse-by-pulse current limiting, and has better dynamic line regulation. In order to limit peak currents through components, continuous conduction mode (CCM) was chosen. In the CCM, RMS currents in the coupled inductor, the switch and the diode can be half as compared to the currents in discontinuous conduction-mode operation, requiring the larger components. Because the output ripple current is less than it would be if discontinuous mode were used, the output capacitors also are smaller. Continuous conduction mode, however, requires higher magnetizing inductances to stay in CCM throughout the entire operating range and maintain a right-half-plane zero in its transfer function.
Selecting the switching frequency is the foundation of the optimization and design compromise flow to determine all the component values. A higher switching frequency leads to smaller component sizes with fair efficiency, while lower frequency increases the achievable efficiency but will require slightly bulkier components. The MAX15005A switching frequency (FS) is programmable from 15 kHz to 1 MHz using an external resistor (RT) and capacitor (CT) network. Ideally, FS can be set below 150 kHz so that the third harmonics can remain below AM band, thus minimizing RF noise (interference). Some applications, such as VFD converters, require very low EMI and prefer switching frequencies as low as 20 kHz. The converter switching frequency (FS) is externally synchronizable to further assist in keeping the EMI low and away from the tuned AM band.
After selecting the power circuit topology, the next decision is to determine the maximum duty cycle (DMAX) of the switch, Q, in Fig. 2. The duty cycle is the ratio of on-time of Q to total period (D = T
The dc transfer function of a CCM SEPIC converter is given by Eq. 1 and Eq. 2:
Where:
V
V
R
The maximum duty cycle occurs at V
INDUCTOR SELECTION
In SEPIC converters, both the inductors are subject to the same voltages and same ripple currents. Thus, both inductors have the same values. However, peak current rating would be different. These days, coupled inductors are readily available with 1-to-1 turn ratios with a coupling factor nearly equal to 1. This saves board space and eliminates the need for a snubber. With coupled inductors, the value of inductance will be half of the individual inductors. The coupled inductance value is selected using Eq. 3.
Where:
ΔIL = Acceptable inductor ripple.
Due to the dc isolation capacitor between input and output, average inductor currents IL1, IL2 are equal to the input current and the load current, respectively. Use the following equation to calculate and ensure the peak inductor current (IL
Where:
η = assumed efficiency.
The required RMS current rating of the inductors that causes the heat losses and temperature rise is given by Eq. 5:
Where:
This design uses a 15-µH MSD1278-153ML coupled inductor from CoilCraft.
INPUT AND OUTPUT CAPACITORS SELECTION
The input currents in SEPIC architectures are continuous. The inductor reduces the ripple currents as well as the required input capacitance. However, a higher value for the input capacitor may be necessary to ensure better impedance interaction with the source input. RMS current rating and the capacitor value needed to maintain specified input ripple are given by Eq. 6 and Eq. 7, respectively.
Where :
ΔVIN is the acceptable input ripple. The ESR ripple is given by Eq. 8.
Where:
ESRCIN = maximum ESR value.
The SEPIC output capacitor has to supply the full load current when SW is ON (and the inductors are charging). The output capacitor thus sees large ripple currents, and it must be able to handle the RMS current given by Eq. 9:
Additionally, the output capacitor value should be selected to maintain the specified output voltage ripple, which includes both ESR ripple and capacitive ripple given by Eq. 10 and Eq. 11.
The waveforms in Fig. 4 show the output and input voltage ripples at 6-V input and 1-A output current. Output peak-to-peak ripple is 128 mV and input peak-to-peak ripple is 25 mV, which are less than 1% of their final values.
COUPLING CAPACITOR SELECTION
The coupling capacitor, C
Because it carries large ripples, the capacitor of choice should be a low ESR, low ESL ceramic-type device. The value of the coupling capacitor depends on the maximum ripple across it and can be calculated using Eq. 13:
The peak voltage across C
Click here for the enhanced PDF version of this article
Click here to view this article in magazine format.
| Related Articles | ||||||||
|
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus


