Input-Source Impedance Affects DC-DC Converter Performance
Jan 1, 2010 12:00 PM
MARCO PANIZZA, Manager, Europe Applications Engineering, Vicor, Andover, Mass.
To maintain dc-dc converter stability, power-system designers typically operate under the assumption that input-source impedance should be small compared to the converter's input impedance. But, not all understand exactly why this is the case.
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
To ensure the stability of dc-dc converters, most power-system designers adhere to the common rule that input source impedance should be small compared to the converter's input impedance. Not all understand exactly why. It is also a common practice for most power-system designers to use a large electrolytic capacitor across the input of the dc-dc converter. In this article, we will analyze the input impedance of a switch-mode dc-dc converter, and explain the reasoning behind the common rule and common practice. View Article Equations
A switch-mode dc-dc converter, regardless of its topology, presents negative incremental input impedance. This can be better understood through the following qualitative reasoning. A dc-dc converter works to maintain a constant output voltage, Vo, at a certain level of power, Po. To do this, it will absorb, from the input source a power, P
Where:
• = converter efficiency
Assume the input voltage decreases by a quantity, -ΔV
Where:
r
For a negative voltage variation corresponding to a positive current variation, the incremental resistance will have a negative sign. The input resistance varies according to input conditions because it depends on power from the input voltage at which the converter is working, as well as the output power that it is delivering.
For a 24-V input converter with an input range of 18 to 36 V and working at a 200-W load, the input current at 36 Vin is:
Under the same conditions, if the voltage reduces to 18 V, the current will increase to 13.5 A and the resistance will be -1.33 Ω.
It is possible to come to same conclusion using a different approach.
A switch-mode dc-dc converter can be seen as a dc transformer, having a transformation coefficient, n, defined as:
The coefficient, n, is dynamically adjusted by the regulation loop to keep the output voltage constant, regardless of the variations in load and input voltage. With this in mind, Eq. 4 can be written as:
Where:
R
For a basic forward converter, the value of n is:
Where D = duty cycle of a pulse-width modulator (PWM) converter
In the case of a zero-current switching (ZCS) dc-dc converter (Fig. 1), the control variable of the regulation loop is not the duty cycle, but the repetition frequency instead; therefore, as a first approximation:
Fig. 1 is a dc-dc converter employing ZCS. The impedance of the source feeding the input of the ZCS module directly affects both the stability and transient response of the module. In general, the source impedance should be lower than the input impedance of the module by a factor of ten, from dc to 50 kHz. To calculate the required source impedance, use the following formula:
Where:
Z = required input impedance
V
P
INPUT-SOURCE IMPEDANCE AND STABILITY
When a dc-dc converter works in a real application, it is connected to a power source having its own internal impedance, which is not zero. Also, additional input impedance may be intentionally added, for example with an input EMI filter. The complete block diagram is in Fig. 2.
Here, the negative incremental input impedance is indicated as: -|r
The overall transfer function, including the input source impedance is:
This can also be written as:
As a general design rule, if Z
It is possible, however, to study more accurately the source impedance effects using a detailed model. In this case, we can write:
and
Replacing the Z
(See Eq. 15, Pg. 25)
To verify the effect of the source impedance on converter stability, it is possible to analyze the roots of the characteristic Eq. 15 and, by the Nyquist criteria, ensure that these will fall in the left half plane of complex domain.
The characteristic equation can be written as:
The roots of this quadratic equation are:
Where:
With a > 0, for s
and
ANALYZING THE RESULTS
Analyzing the results of Eq. 21 and 22, there is an important remark to be made. In fact, one obvious condition is: R
Another practical approach when designing input stages for a dc-dc converter is the common practice of adding a large capacitor in parallel. In this case the block diagram will result in Fig. 3.
Compared to the previous schematic, the resistance, R
The internal capacitor, C
As before, the overall transfer function of the Fig. 3 is:
Where:
Replacing the value of Z
(See Eq. 25 below)
Dividing by |r
The stability can be studied by solving the roots of the left complex plane characteristic equation:
This is a quadratic equation with solutions:
Where:
For the roots to be negative, both a and b must be positive, therefore resulting in:
Eq. 31 states that R
For this reason, ceramic and film input capacitors are not recommended to restore the voltage source. The construction of these parts results in lower ESRs than devices with an electrolytic construction.
From Eq. 32, it is also possible to see that a bigger input inductance requires a larger input capacitance to compensate its effects. Also, for low-voltage systems — such as a 12-V dc-dc converter — with lower input differential resistance, r
References
R.D. Middlebrook, “Input filter considerations, in design and application of switching regulators”, 1976, IEEE.
| Related Articles | ||||||||
|
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus


