No-Load Specification Impacts Power-Supply Performance
Mar 1, 2008 12:00 PM
By Steven M. Sandler, Acme Electric, Aerospace Division, and Charles E. Hymowitz, AEi Systems
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
Figs. 2, 3 and 4 show the step-load simulation results for the circuit in Fig. 1. As we reduce the minimum load current, the resulting response time of the output increases. Therefore, there is a direct relationship between the recovery time of the output and the minimum load current requirement. External load capacitance exacerbates this issue. You see this in the C
Buck Regulator
The second example is a nonsynchronous rectified buck switching regulator. Fig. 5 shows the SPICE model of the regulator and Fig. 6 is a state-space average model.
The definition of critical load current is the operating load current at which the output inductor current is greater than zero. At or above the critical current the voltage gain of the pulse-width modulation stage is constant (with respect to load current). Its definition is:
|
|
The duty cycle in voltage mode control is defined in terms of the peak-to-peak ramp voltage, V
|
Substituting for duty:
|
Then, solving for the gain, which is the derivative of V
|
There is no load current term in this equation, and so the modulator gain is independent of the operating load current if the load current is greater than the critical current. Below the critical current, the gain is reduced as a function of the load current. As the load current decreases, the bandwidth decreases. At some operating current, the bandwidth of the regulator may fall below the zero in the compensation network, which would significantly degrade its stability.
Fig. 7 is the bode response of the circuit in Fig. 5, and Fig. 8 shows its step-load simulation results. According to these results, at very low load currents the phase margin falls to 30 degrees, causing ringing in response to the step load. It also is evident that the ringing is much more severe when switching to 5 mA than it is when switching to 50 mA. This clearly shows the relationship between stability and load current.
Because most specifications require a minimum phase margin of 45 degrees (our 30 degrees is nominal and not worst case), some corrective action would be required. One possibility would be to add an internal preload to assure the regulator load will never be below 50 mA, though this degrades the regulator's efficiency. Another choice is to increase the value of the integrating capacitor (C2) to reduce the zero location below the crossover frequency. This will improve the phase margin and reduce the resulting ringing, although it will degrade recovery time and step-load excursions as shown in Fig. 8.
Regardless of the incorporated solution, the regulator's performance had to suffer so it could accommodate the very low-load or no-load condition. Consider these ramifications carefully when developing a power supply's specification, design and test procedures.
References
-
“SPICE Uncovers Regulator Stability Problems,” PEIN August 1998,
www.aeng.com/pub.asp . -
Sandler, Steven M. Switch-Mode Power Supply Simulation with PSPICE and SPICE 3, Chapter 4, McGraw-Hill, 2006, ISBN 0-07-146326-7.
-
Power IC Model Library for PSPICE documentation, AEi Systems, 2005.
Click here for the enhanced PDF version of this article

