Mathematical Spreadsheets and Simulators: Both Belong in Your Toolbox
Aug 29, 2007 4:38 PM
By Alan Elbanhawy, Director, Advanced Power System Center, Fairchild Semiconductor International, San Jose, Calif.
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
Since SPICE was first developed in the Electronics Research Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley, it has been used by power-supply designers and engineers to investigate power-circuit behavior under all sorts of conditions. Spice gives engineers feedback on their designs before they build their first prototypes. Furthermore, it enables them to solve problems before they encounter them in the lab and without losing a single component. I have used SPICE-class simulators for the last 27 years to understand the reasons for problems in my power circuits by probing deep into the circuit to an extent usually not possible with the actual circuit.
That said, I must note that the accuracy of a simulation depends to a very large extent on the accuracy of the component models. As a result, simulation of power circuits with very complex power semiconductor and transformers/inductors models gives the user a good idea of the circuit performance with reasonable accuracy. So, if you want to put your circuit “under the microscope,” make sure that your models are at least as accurate as you need your simulation results to be.
In my experience, if you have a modern complex power circuit, you will have convergence problems and issues unless you set the simulation relative accuracy of voltages and current to a minimum of 1% to 2% in most cases. That level of accuracy is quite enough in most practical applications. One caution, though: the increased dependency on circuit simulation may, at times, make you lose sight of the actual underlying laws of physics and some of the not-so-obvious dependencies of the solution on different component parameters within a given circuit. That’s an inherent potential of simulation, which by definition, finds a solution for a single set of parameters, components and conditions at a given time.
I have discovered that using mathematical spreadsheet software like Maple gives me a totally different experience in understanding how different individual parameters affect the final performance of the circuit. One added benefit is that the mathematical approach will require you to write the equations from scratch, an exercise that we have almost forgotten with our dependency of circuit simulations where only a circuit schematic is needed.
Mathematical software packages like Maple are capable of finding closed-form solutions to almost any equation or a set of equations including differential equations. A thorough understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODE) is a mandatory prerequisite before attempting to use the software, which is not difficult since ODE is part of any college mathematics course.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus


