Smart Power Module Saves Space, Improves Performance for Switched Reluctance Motors
Mar 9, 2005 11:07 AM
News & Features From Auto Electronics
Committed to improving hybrid electric cars
New Motors for Hybrid Vehicles
Battery Firms Battle for Hybrid Hegemony
Innovative Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells
See More Headlines
Top Articles
Exploring Current Transformer Applications
Ultracapacitor Technology Powers Electronic Circuits
Buck-Converter Design Demystified
Sensorless Motor Control Simplifies Washer Drives
PET Resources
Buyer's Guide
Conferences
Engineering Jobs
Power Electronics Events
Rent Our Lists
Spotlight on Digital Power
Fairchild Semiconductor has introduced a Smart Power Module (SPM) designed for driving single-phase switched reluctance motors (SRM) for vacuum cleaners. Fairchild’s 50-A-rated FCAS50SN60 Smart Power Module integrates a high-voltage IC (HVIC) and low-voltage IC (LVIC), IGBTs, fast recovery diodes and a thermistor in an ultracompact (44-mm × 26.8-mm) Mini-DIP package. This package features direct bonded copper (DBC) technology that significantly increases thermal performance.
Compared to typical discrete solutions, Fairchild’s FCAS50SN60 reduces power circuit space by up to 40%, enabling designers to incorporate the controller into the SRM assembly. This compact solution greatly reduces overall system size while simultaneously enhancing reliability.
The UL-certified FCAS50SN60, with its built-in HVIC, provides an optocoupler-less, single-supply IGBT gate-driving capability that further reduces overall system size. Its integrated undervoltage lock-out and short-circuit protection ensures excellent reliability. In addition, the FCAS50SN60’s optimized switching speed meets EMI requirements.
In addition to saving space, the SPM’s Mini-DIP package with DBC technology provides extremely low thermal resistance (Rth(j-c) IGBT = 0.9°C/W). Available now, the FCAS50SN60 is priced at $ 30 each in quantities of 100.
For more information, visit www.fairchildsemi.com/pf/FC/FCAS50SN60.html.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus


