Inductors dissipate power in the core and in the
windings. Although exact calculations of these
losses can be complex and difficult, they can be
readily estimated using data sheet parameters
available from magnetic component suppliers.
For the PDF version of this article, click here.
A switchmode power supply incurs loss in many areas of its circuitry, including the MOSFETs, input and output capacitors, quiescent controller current and inductor. The power dissipated in the inductor arises from two separate sources: the losses associated with the inductor core and those associated with the inductor windings. Though determining these losses with precision can require complex measurements, an easier alternative exists. Inductor losses may be estimated using readily available data from core and inductor suppliers along with the relevant power supply application parameters.
Inductor Basics
An inductor consists of wire wound around a core of ferrite material that includes an air gap. A subset within the broad inductor category, power inductors operate as energystorage devices. They store energy in a magnetic field during the power supply's switchingcycle on time and deliver that energy to the load during the off time. To understand power loss in inductors, you must first understand the basic parameters associated with inductors. These include magnetomotive force F(t), magneticfield strength H(t), magnetic flux Φ(t), magneticfield density B(t), permeability µ, and reluctance R.
To avoid the complicated physics of electromagnetic fields, we offer only a brief treatment of these parameters. The magnetic field strength generated by an inductor is measured in amperes multiplied by turns per meter. The magnetic field is created when current flows in the turns of wire that wrap around the magnetic core. For switchmode power inductors, we can approximate the magnetic field by assuming it is completely contained within the core.
Magneticfield density, measured in teslas, is equal to the magneticfield strength, H(t), multiplied by the magneticcore permeability, µ:
Magnetic flux, which is measured in webers, equals the magneticfield density, B(t), multiplied by the crosssectional area of the core, A_{C}:
Permeability, measured in henrys/m, expresses the capability of a specific material to allow the flow of magnetic flux more easily. Thus, higher permeability enables a material to pass more magnetic flux. Permeability is a product:
in which µ_{0} is the permeability of free space (µ_{0} = 4π × 10^{7} H/m) and µ_{R} is the material's relative permeability (a dimensionless quantity). For example, µ_{R} for iron is approximately 5000 and µ_{R} for air — the other extreme — is 1. The core of a power inductor contains an air gap and ferrite material, so its effective µ is somewhere between that of ferrite and air.
Magnetomotive force, F(t), is approximated in our case as the magneticfield strength, H(t), multiplied by the effective length of the core, l_{E}:
where the units for F(t) are amperes multiplied by turns. Effective length is the length of the path followed by the magnetic flux around the core. In a magnetic circuit, F(t) can be regarded as the generator of magnetic flux (Fig. 1). Finally, reluctance, which is measured in amperes multiplied by turns/weber, is the resistance of a material to magnetic fields. Reluctance is also the ratio of magnetomotive force, F(t), to magnetic flux, Φ(t), and therefore depends on the physical construction of the core. Substitution of the above equations for F(t) and Φ(t) yields the following equation for reluctance:
Inductors operate according to the laws of Ampere and Faraday. Ampere's Law relates current in the windings — or turns of wire — to the magnetic field in the core of the inductor. As an approximation, one assumes the magnetic field in the inductor's core is uniform throughout the core length (l_{E}). That assumption lets us write Ampere's Law as:
where “n” is the number of wire turns around the inductor core and i(t) is the inductor current.
Faraday's Law relates the voltage applied across the inductor to the magnetic flux contained within the core:
where Φ(t) is the magnetic flux and “n” is the number of wire turns around the core. The functional diagram of Fig. 1 shows a power inductor and its equivalent magnetic circuit. As shown, the air gap places a highreluctance element (R_{AIR}) in series with a lowreluctance ferrite material (R_{Fe}), thereby locating the bulk of the magnetomotive force, ni(t), at a desired location — that of the air gap. The inductor value is calculated as:
Because ferrite materials have high permeability, they offer an easy path for magnetic flux (low reluctance). That characteristic helps contain the flux within the inductor's core, which in turn enables the construction of inductors with high values and small size. This advantage is evident in the inductance equation above, in which a core material with high µ value allows for a smaller crosssectional area.
Inductor Operation
The power inductor in a buck or boost converter operates as follows. Turning on the primary switch applies a source voltage V_{IN} across the inductor, causing the current to increase as:
This changing current, di(t)/dt, induces a changing magnetic field in the core material according to Ampere's Law:
In turn, magnetic flux through the inductor's core increases as:
and that increase can be rewritten in terms of magneticfield density:
The primary switch opens during the off time and removes V_{IN}, causing the magnetic field to decrease. In response, a decreasing dΦ/dt in the inductor's core induces (according to Faraday's Law) a voltage n dΦ/dt across the inductor.
A graph of B(t) as a function of H(t) for a sinusoidal input voltage produces the hysteresis loop shown in bold lines on Fig. 2. B(t) is measured as H(t) is increased. The response of B(t) versus H(t) is nonlinear and exhibits hysteresis, hence the name hysteresis loop. Hysteresis is one of the corematerial characteristics that causes power loss in the inductor core.
Power Loss in the Inductor Core
Energy loss due to the changing magnetic energy in the core during a switching cycle equals the difference between magnetic energy put into the core during the on time and the magnetic energy extracted from the core during the off time. Total energy (E_{T}) into the inductor over one switching period is:
Using Ampere's Law:
and Faraday's Law:
the equation for E_{T} can be rewritten as:
Thus, the total energy put into the core over one switching period is the area of the shaded region within the BH loop of Fig. 2 multiplied by the volume of the core. The magnetic field decreases as inductor current ramps down, tracing a different path (following the direction of the arrows in Fig. 2) for magnetic flux density. Most of the energy goes to the load, but the difference between stored energy and delivered energy equals the energy lost. Energy lost in the core is the area traced out by the BH loop multiplied by the core's volume, and the power lost is this energy (E_{T}) multiplied by the switching frequency.
Hysteresis loss varies as a function of ΔB^{n}, where (for most ferrites) “n” lies in the range 2.5 to 3. This expression applies on the conditions that the core is not driven into saturation, and the switching frequency lies in the intended operating range. The shaded area in Fig. 2, which occupies the first quadrant of the BH loop, represents the operating region for positive fluxdensity excursions, because typical buck and boost converters operate with positive inductor currents.
The second type of core loss is due to eddy currents, which are induced in the core material by a timevarying flux dΦ/dt. According to Lenz's Law, a changing flux induces a current that itself induces a flux in opposition to the initial flux. This eddy current flows in the conductive core material and produces an I^{2}R, or V^{2}/R, power loss.
That effect also can be seen via Faraday's Law. If you imagine the core as a lumped resistive element with resistance R_{C}, then the voltage v_{I}(t) induced across R_{C} according to Faraday's Law is:
where A_{C} is the crosssectional area of the core. The power loss in the core due to eddy currents is
This power loss is proportional to the square of the rate of change of flux in the core. Since the rate of change of flux is directly proportional to the applied voltage, the power loss due to eddy currents increases as the square of the applied inductor voltage and directly with its pulse width. Thus:
where V_{L} is the voltage applied to the inductor, t_{APPLIED} is the on or off time, and T_{P} is the switching period. Because the core material has high resistance, losses due to eddy currents in the core are usually much less than those due to hysteresis. The data given for core losses usually includes the effects of both hysteresis and core eddy currents.
Coreloss measurements are difficult because they require complicated setups for measuring flux density and because they involve the estimation of hysteresisloop areas. Many inductor manufacturers do not supply this data, but curves are available from ferrite manufacturers to help you approximate the core loss in an inductor. Such curves indicate power loss in W/kg or W/cm^{3} as a function of peaktopeak flux density, B(t), and frequency (f).
The magnetics division of Spang and Co. in Pittsburgh supplies ferrite material for inductor manufacturers. From the website www.maginc.com, you can obtain material data sheets that include curves for core loss versus flux density at various frequencies. If you know the particular ferrite material and the volume of the inductor's core, these curves enable you to make a good estimate of core loss.
Such curves for a given ferrite material (Fig. 3) are taken with a sinusoidal applied voltage using bipolar flux swings. When estimating the core loss for dcdc converters that operate with unipolar flux swings and rectangular applied voltages, which consist of higherfrequency harmonics, you can approximate the loss using the fundamental frequency and onehalf the peaktopeak flux density:
The core volume can usually be estimated with a rough measurement.
A few inductor manufacturers do offer coreloss graphs or equations that enable more accurate estimations of core power loss. For example, Pulse Engineering in San Diego provides inductor coreloss equations in some of its inductor data sheets (see www.pulseeng.com). See SMT power inductors P1172/P1173 for examples. These data sheets include an equation using constants (Kfactors) that enable the calculation of core loss as a function of frequency and peaktopeak ripple in the inductor current.
On the other hand, Coiltronics, headquartered in Boynton Beach, Fla., presents core loss for many of its inductors in graph form (see FLATPAC 3 series power inductors for example at www.coiltronics.com). Fig. 4 shows the curve for core power loss versus flux density and frequency from a Coiltronics FlatPac 3 data sheet.
Power Loss in Inductor Windings
The preceding discussion presented losses in the inductor core, but losses also occur in the inductor windings. Power loss in the windings at dc is due to the windings' dc resistance and the RMS current through the inductor (I_{RMS}^{2} · R_{DC}). Resistance (R) is defined as:
where r is the resistivity of the winding material. This material is usually copper, for which ρ=1.724 ·10^{8}(1+.0042 · (T°C20°C))Ωm). Physically smaller inductors typically use smaller wire, and thus exhibit a higher dc resistance due to the smaller crosssectional area of the wire. Largervalue inductors have more turns of wire, and therefore also have higher resistance due to the longer length.
Winding losses at dc are due to the dc resistance (R_{DC}) of the windings and are given in the inductor data sheet. With increasing frequency, the winding resistance increases due to a phenomenon called skin effect, caused by a changing i(t) within the conductor. The changing current induces a changing flux (dΦ/dt) perpendicular to the current that induced it.
According to Lenz's Law, the changing flux induces eddy currents that induce a flux themselves, in opposition to the initial changing flux. These eddy currents are of a polarity opposite that of the initial current. The induced flux is strongest at the conductor's center and weakest at the surface, causing the current density at the center to decline from its dc value with increasing frequency. As a result, current gets pushed to the surface of the conductor, producing a lower current density at the center and a higher current density at the surface. Resistance increases because the resistivity of copper remains constant and the conductor's effective current carrying area decreases.
The windings' ac resistance is found by determining the depth, known as penetration depth, to which current exists in the conductor at a particular frequency. Current density at that point falls to 1/e times the current density at the surface, or at dc. This depth (D_{PEN}) can be calculated as:
where r is the resistivity of the conductor (usually copper) and µ is the conductor's permeability (µ = µ_{0} · µ_{R}, where µ_{R} = 1 for copper). This calculation is accurate when the conductor is a flat surface or when the radius of the conductor is much larger than the penetration depth. Note that ac resistance (R_{AC}) acts as a power loss only to the ac current, which for buck and boost converters is the inductorcurrent ripple. DC current in the inductor only creates power loss in R_{DC}.
You find R_{AC} by calculating the effective conducting area of the copper wire at a given frequency. For conductors that have radii larger then the skin depth at the given operating frequency, the effective conducting area is the surface area of a conducting ring with thickness equal to the skin depth. Because resistivity remains constant, the ratio of R_{AC} to R_{DC} is simply the ratio of the two areas:
Furthermore, R_{AC}/R_{DC} multiplied by R_{DC} is the effective resistance at a given frequency for a straight wire in free space.
Eddy currents in the inductor windings are also induced by other nearby conductors, a phenomenon known as the proximity effect. For inductors with many overlapping wire turns and adjacent wires, the increased eddy currents cause a resistance considerably higher than that from the skin effect alone. The proximity effect becomes complicated, however, due to the various configurations and distances with which conductors can be placed relative to each other. Because such calculations are beyond the scope of this article, the reader should refer to the references provided.
A simple circuit illustrates losses in the inductor (Fig. 4). R_{C} represents the core losses, and R_{AC} and R_{DC} represent the ac and dcdependent winding losses. R_{C} is determined by core loss calculations or estimates, while R_{DC} is the dc winding resistance and R_{AC} is the ac resistance due to skin effect, proximity effect or both. An example of this loss model can be developed using the MAX5073 switching power supply. We operate the MAX5073 as a buck converter with V_{IN} = 12 V, V_{OUT} = 5 V, f_{SW} =1 MHz, and I_{OUT} = 2 A. A 4.7µH inductor (FP34R7 from Coiltronics) produces an inductor current ripple (ΔI(t)) of 621 mA.
A graph of core loss versus flux density and frequency is shown in Fig. 4. Peaktopeak flux density (ΔB) is what matters. It traces out a small hysteresis loop within the larger hysteresis loop (see the inner loop in Fig. 2). You can find ΔB using the equation given in the inductor data sheet:
where K is a constant given in the data sheet (K = 105 in our case), and L is the inductance in microhenries. In this example:
As an alternative, you can estimate ΔB(t) using the inductor voltsecond product divided by the number of turns and the core area within the turns:
Going to the FP3 data sheet, core loss at 613 gauss and f_{SW}= 1 MHz is approximately 470 mW. R_{C} in Fig. 5 is the equivalent parallel resistance that accounts for power loss in the inductor core. That resistance is calculated from the RMS voltage across the inductor and the core power loss:
R_{C} is then 60.1 V^{2}/0.470 W=128 Ω, where V_{IN} × √D is the RMS value of a rectangular wave with duty cycle D and amplitude V_{IN}.
R_{DC} from the data sheet is 40 mΩ, assuming a zero temperature rise for the inductor, which would otherwise increase the value of R_{DC}. The penetration depth for a 1MHz switching frequency, using only the fundamental of the triangular current ripple at T_{A} = +20°C, is 0.065 mm. A rough measurement of the conductor's radius gives 0.165 mm, which results in an R_{AC} value of:
This resistance only dissipates power due to the RMS ac current. The RMS value of inductor current ripple is:
Thus, the total estimated losses are:
References

Erickson, Robert W., and Dragan Maksimovic. Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2001. Chapters 13 and 14, pp. 491562.

Kassakian, John G., Martin F. Schlecht, and George C. Verghese. Principles of Power Electronics, 1991. Chapter 20, pp. 565601.

Dixon, Lloyd H. Magnetics Design for Switching Power Supplies. Sections 15.